Skip to content

ci: wire org-wide security-scan + CODEOWNERS#16

Merged
WomB0ComB0 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
ci/standardize-security-governance
Apr 15, 2026
Merged

ci: wire org-wide security-scan + CODEOWNERS#16
WomB0ComB0 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
ci/standardize-security-governance

Conversation

@WomB0ComB0
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Standardization pass. Adds:

  • .github/workflows/security.yml — caller for the reusable security-scan.yml (CodeQL + Gitleaks + OSV + dependency-review).
  • .github/CODEOWNERS — default owner.

Repo already has .github/dependabot.yml; left untouched. Inherits CoC / Contributing / Security / Support / PR + issue templates from resq-software/.github.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Standardization pass across public ResQ repos.

  .github/workflows/security.yml  Caller for the reusable security-scan
                                  workflow in resq-software/.github with
                                  languages=["actions"].

  .github/CODEOWNERS               Default owner.

Inherits CoC / Contributing / Security / Support / PR + issue templates
from resq-software/.github.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 15, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@WomB0ComB0 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 59 minutes and 34 seconds before requesting another review.

Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 59 minutes and 34 seconds.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 567dba1a-2481-4bcf-b654-6d98239ce4cb

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 98f519b and c4788dc.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/CODEOWNERS
  • .github/workflows/security.yml
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch ci/standardize-security-governance

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@WomB0ComB0 WomB0ComB0 merged commit 0861af3 into main Apr 15, 2026
3 checks passed
@WomB0ComB0 WomB0ComB0 deleted the ci/standardize-security-governance branch April 15, 2026 01:50
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a .github/CODEOWNERS file to define default ownership for the repository. Feedback indicates that the security workflow file mentioned in the PR description is missing from the current changes. Additionally, it is recommended to replace the individual global owner with a team to ensure better maintenance and review availability.

Comment thread .github/CODEOWNERS
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
# Default owner for everything not matched by a more specific rule.
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

The pull request title and description indicate that this PR adds .github/workflows/security.yml to implement organization-wide security scanning. However, this file is missing from the current changes. Please include the intended workflow file to fulfill the PR's objective.

Comment thread .github/CODEOWNERS
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
# Default owner for everything not matched by a more specific rule.
* @WomB0ComB0
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Using a single individual (@WomB0ComB0) as the global code owner is a maintenance risk. For an organization-level repository, it is recommended to use a team (e.g., @resq-software/maintainers) to ensure that PR reviews and repository management are not dependent on a single person's availability.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant